I definitely believe that we have got it all wrong when hard working law abiding citizens end up paying vast sums to keep prisoners in a state of relative luxury. I am all for human rights and that people should be treated with dignity and respect but I draw the line where prisoners, who have committed crimes against society, end up being housed and fed in better conditions than many ordinary citizens who struggle to put food on the table every day.
Once convicted and sentenced then a person should only be allowed basic human rights where they are given a roof over their heads (albeit a cell), three meals a day (enough to satisfy their essential nutritional requirements without fancy fare) and time to exercise (in an open courtyard), and where they have access to books and work opportunities (making vehicle number plates or on chain gangs picking up litter on road side curbs.) I am against big flat screen TV's, steak for dinner, etc.
In a recent article in the Saturday Star (31 July 2010) a brand new prison spent R260 000 on 50 flat screen TV's so that inmates could watch sports from their cells. These have to be moved at a cost of R800 000 because inmates are unable to watch TV whilst in their cells. That's enough to build 20 RDP housess or feed 1000 people for 50 days.
So how do the prison officials justify the TV's. Apparently the TV's are an integral part of the disciplinary process where naughty inmates have their TV privileges withdrawn. They were naughty in the first place that's why they are there! I say that, as an example, an inmate that has been incarcerated for murder, who's victim cannot watch TV anymore, should not be allowed TV at all!
They should only be given enough to live without fills or luxuries. They need time to reflect about what they did. Time to haunted by there misdeeds. Time to repent. And certainly not in an environment that is better than most law abiding tax paying citizens enjoy! Yip something is definitely wrong!

